The
Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership or RCEP is a trade agreement
involving 10 ASEAN nations namely (Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia,
Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam) and five nations with
which they have a free Trade Agreement, those are (Australia, China, Japan, New
Zealand and South Korea). RCEP came into existence at the 37th ASEAN Summit
hosted virtually by Vietnam. It is the world’s biggest trade deal comprising
15 countries, 2.2 bn people, combined Gross Domestic Product of $26.2 tn Till
recently, India was also a part of the trade deal, which it decided not to
continue with. We will see the reasons why India took such an important
decision of not joining the RCEP.
First let’s see what the conditions to join
the RCEP trade deal are:
RCEP
Requires members to:
- Decrease tariffs and non-tariff barriers against
each other.
- Encourage investments, economic and technical
cooperation like Foreign Direct Investments, FIIs, etc.
- Protect intellectual property rights (IPR), etc.
Collectively,
the member countries command 25% of global Gross Domestic Product, 30% of
global trade. This will boost trade, economic growth and employment in each of
these member countries. Help emerging economies to catch up with the rest of
the world by lowering tariffs and promoting investment. But India
opted not to join it, citing following reasons:
- $100 bn trade deficit with RCEP
countries: In this,
China alone accounts for $54 bn. Decreasing tariffs and import barriers
will further raise the trade deficit. Our MSME, automobile, steel,
electronic goods companies cannot compete with other technologically
advanced nations. So, India wants separate tax on Chinese imports.
- India’s expertise is mostly liquid milk products with limited shelf life and high
transport cost. So we cannot export much. Whereas New Zealand's expertise
is solid milk products (milk
powder, cheese etc.) which can be exported easily with long shelf life. So
Indian dairy industry will suffer if India joins the free trade agreement.
- Southern India’s plantation farmers are afraid of
cheaper tea, coffee, rubber, cardamom and pepper from Malaysia, Indonesia
and other RCEP nations.
- India’s demand for automatic trigger safeguard mechanisms: if imports increase
beyond a certain limit, it will be allowed to impose tax on imports
automatically.
- Ratchet Obligations: This is an important concept in the global trade that once you make a commitment, then you cannot revert it. India is against this obligation and demanded certain impositions.
- RCEP requires free flow of data, where companies can
store private data in foreign servers of RCEP countries. India’s weight
for data localization, that is
to be stored in local servers citing national interest and strategic
interest.
- India demanded stricter rules of origin to prevent
dumping from China.
·
The
agreement does not cover environmental protections and labour rights.
India
should have joined the RCEP
·
The
chief Economic Advisor, K. Subramaniam
has said that India will have to eventually shed-off its big but poor
mentality.
·
International
agreements always requires some sort of bargaining.
·
Competition
with advance nations would bring excellence in domestic economy.
·
If
we do not join, our exports cannot compete in RCEP nations. Higher fares on
India exports viz a viz other RCEP exports would result in fall in the demand
for Indian goods.
·
RCEP
conditions was still ‘less strict’ in comparison to India’s outgoing FTA
negotiations with USA and European Union.
·
It
will support economic recovery amid pandemic and contribute to developing
supply chains.
·
It
was a low-hanging fruit, and we should have signed it.
Conclusion
While
it is true that India could have gained in certain export sectors by singing
RCEP agreements. But its present format did not fully address India’s issues
and concerns regarding the protection of the domestic industry. So we have
opted not to sign it.
The
remaining member nations have signed the RCEP agreement in 2020 and they are
trying to convince India to get onboard.
India
has not permanently shut the doors for negotiations. In future we may sign it,
if our concerns are addressed.
You can read our article on Changing Political Order
here.
Thank you for reading this article, you can share your feedback in the comments section. You can also suggest the topics on which you want our analysis.
You can join our facebook page for more such articles at:- thecivilanalyst
Comments
Post a Comment